dickie wrote:I wouldn't be too frightened of helicoils. Properly installed they are better than virgin alloy. I had a bad experience with a woman 30 years ago, but I'm still married to her to this day
Seriously, helicoils will easily hold the load of a horn cast, just ask someone who you know is competent at fitting them to do it. If you get them filled, drilled and tapped, it may not fit exactly as it did in the first place unless the new holes are drilled bob-on. Easier to keep original position and angle with helicoils.
No, I'm not a helicoil salesman.
I can imagine they are stronger than cast alloy, very soft and very weak and very easily abused, yeah see your point about been spot on with drilling and tapping the holes again, I'll have to post a piccy of it cause the shagged hole is shagged in more ways than one, the hole is all to cock so might be a tuff one to helicoil it in the correct position.
Warkton Tornado No.1 wrote:I agree with Dickie (apart from the marriage part. I wasn't aware that "menopause" literally meant "men-on-pause" as it did in "our" case as she refused medication. Ho hum.....)
Helicoils are ALWAYS fitted to non ferrous alloy parts by the likes of Rolls-Royce etc in aerospace applications.
However, if the failed threads are for the fasteners that go up through the mudguard, you are better in any case to fit a (preferably stainless or brass) stud with a rubber-faced penny washer & stainless nyloc nut.
It would take a card carrying anorak to spot that & it is a better engineering solution.
Thank god I don't fly much

no but really. guess they must be good if RR use them, like the stud idea though with plenty of coppa slip to stop any of them seizing in the alloy, as they do............
