LCGB Forums

Posted: **Sun May 10, 2015 4:06 pm**

Please can we have a consensus. cam lam say the larger number the leaner the slide, mark broadhurst says the opposite. Which one is it?

Posted: **Sun May 10, 2015 4:16 pm**

The larger the number the higher the height of the front cutaway so that allows more air in, therefore leaner.

Posted: **Sun May 10, 2015 4:59 pm**

^ yes

Posted: **Sun May 10, 2015 5:37 pm**

Totally logical. Thank you.

Posted: **Sun May 10, 2015 7:31 pm**

Raveydavey wrote:Please can we have a consensus. cam lam say the larger number the leaner the slide, mark broadhurst says the opposite. Which one is it?

Where does Broady say that, all I can find on the mb site under the phbh slide is "This slide is suitable for PHBH type carburettors.

The lower the number the richer the slide."

Posted: **Sun May 10, 2015 8:27 pm**

Table at the bottom of the page.

http://www.lambrettaspares.com/info/set ... 3+176.html

Probably a typo. Confused the hell out of me :oops:

Posted: **Sun May 10, 2015 9:00 pm**

Yep, looks like whoever set up that table used copy and paste and just missed the change, mind you the writings tiny lol.

Posted: **Sun May 10, 2015 10:29 pm**

It does mention the error in the text immediately above the table.

Posted: **Mon May 11, 2015 5:55 pm**

I didn't notice that i have to admit, i sent Ian that works there a message yesterday to let him know anyway.

LCGB Forums

PHBH slide which is richer?

PHBH slide which is richer?

Re: PHBH slide which is richer?

Re: PHBH slide which is richer?

Re: PHBH slide which is richer?

Re: PHBH slide which is richer?

Re: PHBH slide which is richer?

Re: PHBH slide which is richer?

Re: PHBH slide which is richer?

Re: PHBH slide which is richer?