The ability to post messages is restricted to LCGB members. Any questions contact us at lcgbadmin@googlemail.com
a.lo wrote:good ideas above, but surely the carb will suck air in as well
Fast n Furious wrote:Spit back on a reed valve motor can be just as bad as a piston porter. This usually happens as a result of the reeds weakening with age, which delays their closure time permitting primary compression to flow back up the inlet manifold instead of up the transfer ports.
I recently fitted some dual-stage reeds to my 6 petal valve and find that I no longer have pools of fuel-oil on the floor boards any more.
Additionally,
The engine is much more tractable,
There is a significant improvement in the 4.5- 5.0K rev doldrum dead zone, which plagued this engine with my worn 4 petal AF reed valve.
I can safely run a weaker mixture.
The Fuel consumption savings are a welcome blessing.
Only got a 1000 miles on this so far but the prognosis looks very good.
Well happy.
Fast n Furious wrote:Spit back on a reed valve motor can be just as bad as a piston porter.
Fast n Furious wrote:Indeed, poor carburation set up will exacerbate the issue. As will a carb that is really to big for the motor's level of tune.
What type of reedvalve are you using Dickie? 4 petal? 6 petal?
When you fitted the dual stage reeds, did you use or discard the original deflection plates?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests