The ability to post messages is restricted to LCGB members. Any questions contact us at lcgbadmin@googlemail.com
Leotech wrote:Anyone have any real world experience of using these two pipes one the same engine?
I'm currently using a Fanspeed Supertourer, but not 100% happy with it.
Leotech wrote:Anyone have any real world experience of using these two pipes one the same engine?
I'm currently using a Fanspeed Supertourer, but not 100% happy with it.
MickYork wrote:With the JL4 you'll be changing down more often...
Mine pulled 4.4 fine, what's the rest of your spec' ?
Leotech wrote:No, Ron said not to but I scooped the back out of the piston It's got almost 180 inlet timing.
The reed wasn't about top speed performance, it was about trying clean up the bottom end and saving fuel compared with the blow back of the piston ported engine.
westy wrote:Sorry to jump in to your post but, can anyone give advise on which gives broadest power range across all revs between JL3 vs JL Supertourer ?
I emailed Oliver Lomas and he reccommended the Supertourer has best all range power better than the JL3, but is the Evo more usable?
Im running a Mugello 198, 26mm jetex on an Sx150 standard gearbox. Despite the 3 to 4 ratio, I'd prefer to keep it. Any advice?
westy wrote:if theJL3 runs out of puff early, am i better going with the JLSupertourer, or the Evo?
I want good pull around town and useful for long trips..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests