My feelings are that for any kit to respond well, there has to be a methodical approach taken in respect of all the variables.
As a result & by keeping records of each tune that I nave done, I am comfortable with the 'constants' that I apply, such as ignition timing, squish, compression ratio & (of course

) exhaust bleed size. In many instances, such as the Rapido, you have little choice other than to try & achieve better port timings via stroking to 60 mm or more. That's not so bad if a build requires a fresh crankshaft anyway, especially if an OEM design is available, which I would prefer (see HPC below)
In all the years that I have had Lambrettas, commencing early 70's, I have gone from the doctrine of high compression, high primary compression & small(er) tailpipe in the interests of torque, to the complete opposite in many ways.
I know that there is currently a school of thought that suggests that crankcase transfer porting yields no measurable benefit, but I continue to do so because any means of reducing primary compression is to the good IMO.
Pumping losses simply because there is a HPC should be borne in mind, though I don't have the luxury of any equipment to prove what I say. However, @ the risk of repeating myself, it is a fact that two stroke engines are likely to yield gains by just adding a longer conrod with barrel packing. The other benefits of lowering primary compression & having an exhaust that doesn't gas up is that the engine is more likely to be able to over-rev without 'hitting a brick wall' & thus be safer @ WOT downhill. Just don't roll off the throttle as one MQ kitted rider learnt the hard way.......
