The ability to post messages is restricted to LCGB members. Any questions contact us at lcgbadmin@googlemail.com
Rich Oswald wrote:That is low Simon, who's dyno? How does it ride? It's not always about the figures, it how it produces the power on the road! I have a Muggy 225 lined and tuned by DSC Scotty with reed valve, only 18bhp on Chis' dyno but rides a dream. No powerbands, just torquey right through.
MickYork wrote:I'm assuming the dyno checked the carb and timing was ok ?
What packers have you used for the cylinder to compensate for the crank (how did alter the ports) ?
Stuck piston rings caused mine to lose 10hp (gummed up using too much oil when running-in)
Simon_T wrote:Rich Oswald wrote:That is low Simon, who's dyno? How does it ride? It's not always about the figures, it how it produces the power on the road! I have a Muggy 225 lined and tuned by DSC Scotty with reed valve, only 18bhp on Chis' dyno but rides a dream. No powerbands, just torquey right through.
pulled 80mph on dyno going to ride it tomorrow but it was terrible before very boggy and wouldn't pull more than 60mph on the road.
will let you know tomorrow.
dscscotty wrote:Hi there just reading through your spec, with regards to the transfer port openings/durations I suspect that they are to long, the 60mm stroke will naturally increase them if you do not actually lower the cylinder. Contrary to popular belief running a 60mm stroke actually requires lowering of the cylinder. If the port timings are not being measured the general rule of thumb would be to align the piston crown with the lower entry wall of the port.
I suspect it's making power to high up the rev range making the delivery of power difficult to find.
Also with regards to the Taffspeed copy, they are actually nothing like them and in no way mimic them on terms of performance.
Regards Scotty DSC
ROClarke wrote:Because they actually only produce 16 to 20 bhp.
Forget all the b@@@@@@t that people brag about.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests