There are various reasons that we are reluctant to change things as brand loyalty exists with many products & I suspect that even two stroke oil is an example. There are various Standards of conformity, but not all oil manufacturers quote the same set of Standards.
Then there is the claim &/or perception that “although oil XYZ is ‘only’ to that Standard PQR it far exceeds it” which is, in itself, a kind of oil ‘trumps’
Effectively, the most enterprising, pioneering riders on this Forum that clock up huge mileages are our Test Pilots for oil along with many other products & I, for one, feel grateful when they are good enough to share their findings. I salute them!
There can be very little doubt that within the field of two stroke oils there is the perception that full synthetic may not be as necessary as once perceived.
However, & this is only a sideways look, not a counter argument to that, what about synthetic oils used @ even leaner ratios?
I have no massive back up to my theory as I haven’t travelled, in recent times, anything like the distances covered by many of you reading this.
Nonetheless, I will explain why I wish to air my thoughts.
In 2012 I was given a container of Exol ‘Optima Racing Two Stroke’ as a gesture of good will as the intention was to try it for racing. In the event, due to opinions expressed by A N Other, I dare not make ‘too many changes’ so it sat about for a few years.
Eventually, I tried it in a road tuned, large capacity Rapido & rejected it as it was so smoky @ the ‘norm’ for that engine of 3%.
Then I read on here somebody remaking the same. It may have been Knowledge, but apologies either way if it wasn’t/was* (*delete as applicable!)
I’m down to 2-1/2% now & the smokiness is down to about ‘our’ normal levels & the internals are good, if perhaps a little clung with oil.
So, I’m tempted to try (Gulp!) 2% but waving this flag, here & now, to generate interest but also invite feedback, please, whilst we’re on the subject….
I hope you don’t mind, Eyeguy!
