The ability to post messages is restricted to LCGB members. Any questions contact us at lcgbadmin@googlemail.com
Knowledge wrote:Does the nylon-caged drive side bearings have an extra ball in them?
lam1962brettagg wrote:just about to fit a koyo drive side r2s. took one seal off to find it is plastic/nylon caged??
just wondered what the general concensus is about this. all other main bearings i've fitted have been metal caged.
standard s3 li150 casa new crank.
also, c3 or cm rating if a nylon caged is ok to fit?
cheers in advance.
Warkton Tornado No.1 wrote:lam1962brettagg wrote:just about to fit a koyo drive side r2s. took one seal off to find it is plastic/nylon caged??
just wondered what the general concensus is about this. all other main bearings i've fitted have been metal caged.
standard s3 li150 casa new crank.
also, c3 or cm rating if a nylon caged is ok to fit?
cheers in advance.
A good European or Japanese bearing with 'rolling elements' that utilises cages moulded from mon-metallic cages can be used within the crankshaft support journals without issue. I have fitted many of them, generally on the magneto side, without issue. In fact, the rating of such bearings is often greater because they allow more 'crowding' of the bearing . That is, more balls or rollers can be designed in.
Kart engines that are loaded & rev significantly higher than Lambrettas utilise phenolic resin cages in preference to metallic cages.
The issue with moulded cages is where safety is an important factor.
I have removed newly fitted rear hub bearings with black, soft nylon cages from the layshaft because they fail, despite the manufacturer having the word "INNOCENTI" etched on to them. I am unsure of the copy rights in claiming such remanufactured products are "INNOCENTI" but I suppose one blessing will be that the actual manufacturer is well known to many of us by another name, & the inevitable investigation when one of those causes a serious accident makes it much more difficult for them to deny liability.
neily03 wrote:Sticky's book does say plastic caged bearings are preferable to metal ones for the drive side of the crank. Though I've just fitted a metal caged one myself.
lam1962brettagg wrote:neily03 wrote:Sticky's book does say plastic caged bearings are preferable to metal ones for the drive side of the crank. Though I've just fitted a metal caged one myself.
thanks for that. hadn't read that bit myself so i'll take a look. fitted a metal cage one now too anyway.
cheers
Danbretta wrote:Any reason why the nylon cages are preferable? I'm hoping to fit a bearing onto the crank tomorrow and have a choice of both koyo metal caged and skf nylon caged German made. Any advice?
Thanks.
Warkton Tornado No.1 wrote:
A good European or Japanese bearing with 'rolling elements' that utilises cages moulded from mon-metallic cages can be used within the crankshaft support journals without issue. I have fitted many of them, generally on the magneto side, without issue. In fact, the rating of such bearings is often greater because they allow more 'crowding' of the bearing . That is, more balls or rollers can be designed in.
Kart engines that are loaded & rev significantly higher than Lambrettas utilise phenolic resin cages in preference to metallic cages.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 32 guests