by Adam_Winstone » Sat Dec 20, 2014 4:00 pm
As mentioned previously, the identification markings on Innocenti factory fitted SX200 and GP200 barrels are exactly the same so I've got no doubt that Digger is right in suggesting that his may be an SX200 barrel. Basically, they are the same, to the point that they have the same Innocenti part number. If you wanted a replacement from original stock, they would have sent you the same item as a replacement for either the SX or GP 200.
My thoughts:
1. The measurements given for the top tracing are bang on what I have listed for my original SX/GP200 barrel with #1 stub number. I really do mean mm perfect! I cannot state for certain that mine is SX or GP as I took it off a motor that I don't know the history of. My #1 is still on a 66mm bore.
2. I have a second #1 barrel which varies slightly but as it is on a 67mm oversize, the very minor (very minor) differences are probably just a result of the ports being cast at an angle, meaning that the bore face measurements change slightly when the cylinder is bore out.
Neither of the above barrels have any work to the ports, as identified by the casting marks being untouched in the ports (not even polished.
3. I then have another barrel that is still on the 66mm bore and, likewise, has no work to the ports. However, this barrel has an exhaust port that is 21.25mm tall, with 38.25mm to top of bore lip. This is a #3 stub SX/GP barrel.
4. In my 'little black book' I have a tracing that I took from a Jet 200 original barrel on 66mm bore and this has both the inlet and exhaust port at 18mm tall.
5. The original number stub TV200 barrels that I have are quite different again and fall into 2 camps; early ring breaker and later non-ring breaker. Both are untouched port-wise but it is worth noting that my later narrow exhaust port TV200 barrel is a number 1, whereas the earlier wide port ring-breaker is a number 3, which supports the statements of others that the stub numbers probably do not represent a chronological / linear development/revision process but probably have a manufacturing significance (e.g. cast number, production line number, batch, other?).
In consideration of the above, and knowing that the higher revving GP200, with 22mm carb, higher revving non-baffle standard pipe, reduced ignition timing and lower ratio gearbox, would have benefited from the slightly longer exhaust duration of the porting illustrated by point 3 above. The lower revving SX200 on longer gearing would have pulled better at low revs on the porting of the barrel in point 1 above. If I were a betting man then I'd suggest point 1 is SX200, point 3 is GP200, noting that the Jet barrel in point 4 is very similar that shown in point 1 (Jet200 and S200 being pretty much the same spec machine).
I reckon that Dimitrios is probably right in thinking that the top tracing is of a standard SX200 spec barrel and the other is a very slightly tuned barrel, of the era when raising the exhaust port by 2mm was a standard porting modification. Please note that we've not yet confirmed that either of the barrels are factory fitted and they may well be aftermarket, of which there are many versions, representing all of the TV/SX/GP specs and beyond.
Adam
Note to self: I must get out more!